CODING & AI DEV
Amp (Sourcegraph)
Paid links. We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes our ranking — see how we rank.
Pricing
We do not reprint prices. They change too often for that to be honest, and a number on our page with no date is worse than sending you to the source.
How we rated it
What it is
Sourcegraph's coding agent, built on their code search: it understands large codebases and makes changes across them, aimed at work that spans many repositories.
Who it is for
Teams with large or multiple codebases where finding the right place to change is itself the hard part.
Where it is strongest
Changes that span a big codebase — a migration, a rename, a pattern applied everywhere — where the code search underneath is the differentiator.
Where it falls short
Aimed at scale, so it is overkill for a single small repository. Enterprise pricing. And large automated changes need careful review, which can take longer than the change.
Our verdict
Recommended for large multi-repository codebases. For one project, Cursor or Claude Code are simpler and cheaper.
Editorial assessment. We earn a commission on some links; it does not change the ranking.